care-tags.org

edmund wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2024 3:29 pm we need to enshrine a particular pair of pants and its measurements as the universal definition of "regular fit" the way the international bureau of weights and measures keeps the International Prototype Kilogram

should have a 3 dimensional number string for leg opening, rise, thigh width (?) 555 is the ISO regular, 900 is low rise bell bottoms, 000 uhh 510s

baggy is ubiquitous, wide cropped is over. imo this is the time to buy a slim cut and be an 'early adopter'

rjbman wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 11:15 pm

i got some gramicci pants from someone (bigbee maybe? griffin?) as a care share gift & they are fucking amazing
[/quote]

@edmund i think they're just the normal ones? https://gramicci.com/collections/mens-p ... 8169209085

remembered these f/w15 umit benan trousers recently and haven't been able to get over them (all over again)

The Raf Stan Smiths tho....

olympiaitsthewater wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 7:03 pm baggy is ubiquitous, wide cropped is over. imo this is the time to buy a slim cut and be an 'early adopter'

I wish it weren't this simple but I fear it is actually this simple

I'm scared that my trousers aren't big enough but didn't we as a collective invent big trousers like ten years ago? Artful pool? The Big Trew Movement? I should be having my moment in the spotlight but I'm hudled in the corner fretting. Might just have not got enough sleep last night.