











some more:
Benson wrote:Got a roll of film back. A lot of it didn't turn out but I don't mind [...]
With film if you make a mistake then that's kind of it, very rarely will i ever shoot doubles as its a waste of money.
Hence the detail which interests me is not, or at least is not strictly, intentional, and probably must not be so. It occurs in the field of the photographed thing like a supplement that is at once inevitable and delightful; it does not necessarily attest to the photographer's art; it's only that the photographer was there, or else, still more simply, that he could not not photograph the partial object at the same time as the total object.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests